Two of the most widely adopted models of human resource management are
the hard and soft versions. These are based on opposing views of huma
n nature and managerial control strategies. The hard model is based on
notions of tight strategic control, and an economic model of man acco
rding to Theory X, while the soft model is based on control through co
mmitment and Theory Y. We argue that because these assumptions are so
divergent, they cannot both properly be incorporated within a single m
odel of human resource management. Eight in-depth case studies were ca
rried out, involving questionnaires, interviews and focus groups in or
der to find out whether organizations were practising either form of H
RM. We found that no pure examples of either form existed, The paper c
oncludes that the rhetoric adopted by the companies frequently embrace
s the tenets of the soft, commitment model, while the reality experien
ced by employees is more concerned with strategic control, similar to
the hard model. This distinction between rhetoric and reality needs to
be taken into account in conceptualizations of human resource managem
ent.