In this study we tested the notion of an instructional level in spelli
ng. In September, we used curriculum-based pretests to identify 48 low
-achieving spellers in 7 third-grade classrooms. 24 of the low-spellin
g third graders (intervention group) were then taught for most of the
year in a second-grade spelling book. The other 24 low spellers (compa
rison group) were taught for the full year in a third-grade spelling b
ook. Results showed that the intervention group scored higher than the
comparison group on the second-grade posttest (75% to 64%), scored al
most as high on the third-grade curriculum-based posttest (47% to 50%)
, and scored higher on the third-grade transfer test (47% to 36%). We
explain the posttest results in terms of instructional level theory an
d then discuss implications for classroom practice.