ALTERNATIVE USES OF ABILITY GROUPING IN SECONDARY-SCHOOLS - CAN WE BRING HIGH-QUALITY INSTRUCTION TO LOW-ABILITY CLASSES

Authors
Citation
A. Gamoran, ALTERNATIVE USES OF ABILITY GROUPING IN SECONDARY-SCHOOLS - CAN WE BRING HIGH-QUALITY INSTRUCTION TO LOW-ABILITY CLASSES, American journal of education, 102(1), 1993, pp. 1-22
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Education & Educational Research
ISSN journal
01956744
Volume
102
Issue
1
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1 - 22
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-6744(1993)102:1<1:AUOAGI>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Despite extensive criticism, ability grouping remains a widespread pra ctice in American secondary schools. This paper considers whether abil ity grouping can be implemented more effectively than is typical; in p articular, it explores possible instances of high-quality instruction in low-ability classes. Data from a study of eighth- and ninth-grade E nglish classes yield two examples of schools with apparently effective instruction in low tracks. These cases are characterized by (1) high expectations by teachers, manifested by a refusal to relinquish the ac ademic curriculum as commonly occurs in low-track classes, (2) extra e xertion by teachers to foster extensive oral discourse in class, and ( 3) no system of assigning weak or inexperienced teachers to lower trac ks.