This study reviews the use of outside informants-individuals not emplo
yed in the firm being studied-in strategy research reported in major j
ournals. We empirically explored the expertness of these informants in
terms of interrater reliability and accuracy of their ratings compare
d to those provided by insiders. Four groups of outside informants in
the airline industry-consultants, security analysts, stakeholders, and
academics-and senior airline executives whose companies initiated cer
tain competitive moves rated strategic attributes associated with thos
e moves. Informants in each group manifested high interrater reliabili
ty. Of the outsiders, analysts were the most accurate and were highly
reliable, and academics were highly reliable and as accurate as consul
tants and stakeholders.