AGREEMENT BETWEEN COMMITTEE-BASED AND FIELD-BASED JOB ANALYSES - A STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF LICENSURE TESTING

Citation
Rj. Tannenbaum et S. Wesley, AGREEMENT BETWEEN COMMITTEE-BASED AND FIELD-BASED JOB ANALYSES - A STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF LICENSURE TESTING, Journal of applied psychology, 78(6), 1993, pp. 975-980
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Applied
ISSN journal
00219010
Volume
78
Issue
6
Year of publication
1993
Pages
975 - 980
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9010(1993)78:6<975:ABCAFJ>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The authors examined agreement between importance ratings used in job analysis. The ratings were obtained from small committees of content e xperts and from field-survey respondents. Three measures of agreement were used: a relative index (product-moment correlation), an absolute index (intraclass correlation), and a dichotomous index(cutpoint). Dat a were obtained from 2 job analysis studies conducted for purposes of developing teacher-licensure tests in Spanish and in chemistry. In bot h studies there was a high level of agreement as measured by the relat ive and dichotomous indexes and a moderately high level of agreement a s measured by the absolute index. The implications of these findings f or job analysts and test developers are discussed.