Rb. Thiele et Df. Treagust, AN INTERPRETIVE EXAMINATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL CHEMISTRY TEACHERS ANALOGICAL EXPLANATIONS, Journal of research in science teaching, 31(3), 1994, pp. 227-242
This article reports an interpretive examination of four teachers' use
of analogies to teach chemistry. The study describes why the teachers
chose to use analogies, how the characteristics of the analogies empl
oyed varied from teacher to teacher, and from where the teachers deriv
ed their analogies. These teachers used analogies spontaneously, as we
ll as on a planned basis, to explain abstract chemistry concepts both
on a whole-class basis and for individual students who indicated a lac
k of understanding. The teachers appeared able to ascertain that the s
tudents required an alternative representation without overtly seeking
evidence to this effect. The presented analogies, especially those th
at were of the simple-comparison type, appeared to have a motivational
impact on the students. Several analogies were extended to map select
ed attributes, and these were believed by the teachers to be powerful
explanatory devices. Pictorial analogies were frequently used to enhan
ce analog familiarity, and further analog explanation was not uncommon
, although the frequency with which the teachers stated the presence o
f analogical limitations was low. The article concludes by suggesting
how science teacher education can be informed by case studies of teach
ing in context, in this instance of analogy-inclusive teaching by four
experienced chemistry teachers.