HIGHLY CONFIDENT BUT WRONG - GENDER DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES IN CONFIDENCE JUDGMENTS

Citation
Ma. Lundeberg et al., HIGHLY CONFIDENT BUT WRONG - GENDER DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES IN CONFIDENCE JUDGMENTS, Journal of educational psychology, 86(1), 1994, pp. 114-121
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational
ISSN journal
00220663
Volume
86
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
114 - 121
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0663(1994)86:1<114:HCBW-G>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Although gender differences are fairly consistent when people report t heir general confidence, much less is known about such differences whe n individuals assess the degree of confidence they have in their abili ty to answer any particular test question. The objective of this resea rch was to investigate gender differences in item-specific confidence judgments. Data were collected from three psychology courses containin g 70 men and 181 women. After answering each item on course exams, stu dents indicated their confidence that their answer to that item was co rrect. Results showed that gender differences in confidence are depend ent on the context (whether items were correct or wrong) and on the do main being tested. Moreover, although both men and women were overconf ident, undergraduate men were especially overconfident when incorrect.