Lhv. Vanderwoude et al., PHYSIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF A NEWLY DESIGNED LEVER MECHANISM FOR WHEELCHAIRS, Journal of medical engineering & technology, 17(6), 1993, pp. 232-240
Lever-propelled wheelchairs have been described as more efficient and
less physically demanding than hand-rim-propelled wheelchairs. To eval
uate a newly designed lever mechanism (MARC) in both one- and two-arm
use, a series of wheelchair exercise tests were performed on a motor-d
riven treadmill. Eight able-bodied male subjects performed a standard
exercise test in the prototype MARC, both in an asynchronic and a sync
hronic bimanual propelling mode and in an unilateral (left-sided) mode
. Subsequently the subjects performed additional exercise tests in a c
onventional crank-to-rod lever mechanism with unilateral and bimanual
propulsion and in a conventional hand rim wheelchair. Analysis of vari
ance was used to study the effect of the different work modes upon pow
er output and cardiorespiratory parameters statistically (p < 0.05). T
he MARC stood out well in comparison with the conventional lever desig
n. The additional design features which are to be implemented (variabl
e gearing, reverse gear) will make the MARC a useful wheelchair. One-a
rm wheelchair propulsion is a very strenuous form of locomotion, requi
ring careful consideration in terms Of provision. Mechanical and ergon
omic improvements are quite feasible in lever propulsion and may to a
certain extent reduce this problem. To improve overall mobility of whe
elchair-dependent subjects further, ergonomic and mechanical design im
provements are very necessary in lever as well as hand-rim wheelchairs
. A combined biomechanical and physiological research approach will he
lp in the definition of design criteria and fitting guidelines.