The ileal digestibility of tryptophan for growing pigs was determined
for cottonseed, meat-and-bone and soya-bean meals. Tryptophan in the f
ood and digesta was measured by two analytical procedures (NaOH hydrol
ysis and colorimetric estimation (method 1) and LiOH hydrolysis and HP
LC determination (method 2)). The results were respectively: cottonsee
d meal 0.46, 0.81; meat-and-bone meal 0.55, 0.65; soya-bean meal 0.74,
0.90. In the first experiment the values for method 1 were shown to b
e inapplicable to pigs. In a second experiment three tryptophan-defici
ent diets (0.05 g ileal digestible tryptophan/MJ digestible energy (DE
)) were formulated using values from method 2 for cottonseed meal, mea
t-and-bone meal plus L-tryptophan and soya-bean meal respectively as t
he only sources of tryptophan in the diets. This experiment was termin
ated after 28 d as overall growth performance of the pigs was very low
. A third experiment was conducted in a similar manner to Expt 2 excep
t that the diets were formulated to 0.065 g ileal digestible tryptopha
n/MJ DE and growth responses and tryptophan retention were assessed ov
er the 20.45 kg growth phase. Growth rates (g/d) of the pigs given the
three diets were significantly different (P < 0.01): cottonseed meal
393, meat-and-bone meal plus L-tryptophan 531, soya-bean meal 437 (SED
39.0). Tryptophan retention (as a proportion of ileal digestible tryp
tophan intake) was significantly different (P < 0.05): cottonseed meal
0.51, meat-and-bone meal plus L-tryptophan 0.49, soya-bean meal 0.41.
These results indicate (1) that the colorimetric technique for assess
ing tryptophan was inapplicable and (2) that ileal digestible values f
or tryptophan were not suitable for formulating diets containing heat-
processed proteins, possibly due to absorption of some of the tryptoph
an in a form that was non-utilizable, and/or to underestimation of tot
al tryptophan in the protein concentrates.