In two 21-d experiments, the performance, nutrient utilization, and ca
rcass composition of ducks fed diets containing pearl millet were comp
ared with those fed diets containing com. Com, in diets at two protein
levels (22 vs 18% in Experiment 1 and 22 vs 16% in Experiment 2), was
replaced by pearl millet either on an equal-weight or isonitrogenous
basis. During the first 2 wk of the first experiment, com diets compar
ed on an isonitrogenous basis were superior (P < .05) to the millet di
ets in promoting weight gain (666 vs 633 g per duck) and feed consumpt
ion (965 vs 914 g per duck); but when compared on an equal-weight basi
s, the millet diets were similar to the com diets in promoting growth.
No significant differences were observed for weight gain, feed consum
ption, or feed efficiency at the end of 3 wk. Over the 21-d study, the
higher protein diets were more efficiently (P < .05) converted to wei
ght gain than the lower protein diets (.63 vs .60 g gain:g feed). Carc
ass protein in ducks fed the com diets was greater (P < .05) than in t
hose fed the pearl millet diets. In Experiment 2, growth performance d
ifferences across dietary protein levels were similar to those in Expe
riment 1. However in contrast to Experiment 1, feed consumption was si
milar for com and pearl millet diets (776 vs 786 g per duck, respectiv
ely), and ducks fed the com diets gained less (P < .05) than those fed
the pearl millet diets (590 vs 622 g per duck) during the first 2 wk
of Experiment 2. Results of the nutrient utilization trial conducted a
t the end of Experiment 2 revealed that diets containing pearl millet
were higher (P < .05) in AME than those containing com (3,300 vs 3,100
kcal/kg). These results indicate that pearl millet has a higher energ
y value and appears to be at least equal to corn in promoting weight g
ains in ducks.