C. Thirtle et Rg. Echeverria, PRIVATIZATION AND THE ROLES OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS IN AGRICULTURAL-RESEARCH IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA, Food policy, 19(1), 1994, pp. 31-44
Privatization has become a popular panacea for solving the organizatio
nal problems of LDC governments. This paper considers the role of the
private sector in agricultural research, especially in sub-Saharan Afr
ica. The first section provides a brief background by stating the main
arguments for market failure in the allocation of resources to resear
ch, followed by the reasoning behind the reaction against public inter
vention. The arguments for intervention are then applied to the differ
ent areas of agricultural research activity to show that the level of
public intervention should depend on the type of research. We suggest
that there are several criteria for defining public and private activi
ties and that there are few research activities that can be easily cla
ssified as purely public or purely private. This implies that the appr
opriate split between public and private research has several dimensio
ns and that efficient institutional arrangements will be specific to p
articular activities. The evidence suggests that there are sound econo
mic arguments for changing the domains of the public and private secto
rs, which should not be static. Both economic development and technica
l innovations, such as biotechnology, will move the boundary in favour
of increased private activity, but the public and private contributio
ns should be viewed as complementary investments rather than substitut
es.