Three groups of college readers were compared on several information-p
rocessing and language comprehension tasks that tap the cognitive comp
onents of reading. The groups were skilled readers with high verbal an
d nonverbal abilities, low-skilled readers with a disparity between ve
rbal and nonverbal abilities, and low-skilled readers who were low in
both verbal and nonverbal ability. Results confirm the importance of w
ord processing and general language comprehension in distinguishing sk
illed from less skilled readers. Results also support the view that re
ading ability is best described as a continuous function and provide e
vidence of the reemergence of lower level processing skills in adults
as a function of text difficulty.