Although the use of evaluative performance standards is common in most
organizations, research in our field has focused almost exclusively o
n selection standards (and predictor cut-off scores), rather than stan
dards for subsequent performance. This review considers aspects of the
performance standard-setting process that influence incumbents' job r
eactions, specifically in terms of motivated performance and job satis
faction. We draw upon the following literatures to specify future rese
arch needs and directions: goal setting, feedback and framing, perform
ance expectations, job satisfaction, and utility analysis. The result
is an outline of research propositions concerning the acceptance of pe
rformance standards, the content of performance standards, the communi
cation of standards, and the difficulty levels of those standards.