TEACHING REFERENTS AND THE WARRANTS USED TO TEST THE VIABILITY OF STUDENTS MENTAL MODELS - IS THERE A LINK

Citation
Sm. Ritchie et al., TEACHING REFERENTS AND THE WARRANTS USED TO TEST THE VIABILITY OF STUDENTS MENTAL MODELS - IS THERE A LINK, Journal of research in science teaching, 34(3), 1997, pp. 223-238
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Education & Educational Research
ISSN journal
00224308
Volume
34
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
223 - 238
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4308(1997)34:3<223:TRATWU>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
From a constructivist perspective, learners construct viable knowledge rather than acquire representations of truth. The warrants of authori ty, coherence, and empirical evidence are identified as means by which the viability of knowledge claims can be established by learners. In this interpretive study, we examined which warrants were invoked by Gr ade 8 science classroom participants in their daily interactions, and whether these were linked to particular teaching referents. We found t hat when the teacher embraced a content exposure referent at the expen se of constructivism, the warrant of authority dominated interactions. The students' alternative conceptions and mental models were not expl ored appropriately. Instead, students most frequently were expected to accept the voice of authority uncritically. By such actions students were restrained from meaningful learning.