Although it is generally assumed that vision is orientation invariant,
that is, that shapes con be recognized regardless of viewing angle, t
here is little evidence that speaks directly to this issue, and what e
vidence there is fails to support orientation invariance. We propose a
n explanation for the previous results in terms of the kinds of shape
primitives used by the visual system in achieving orientation invarian
ce: Whereas contours are used at stages of vision that are not orienta
tion invariant, surfaces and/or volumes are used at stages of vision t
hat are orientation invariant. The stimuli in previously reported stud
ies were wire forms, which can represented only in terms of contour. I
n four experiments, testing both short-term and long-term memory for s
hape, we replicated the previous failures of orientation invariance us
ing wire forms, but found relatively good or perfect orientation invar
iance with equivalently shaped surfaces.