Those who study children's socialization are currently debating the re
lative merits of interpretive and quantitative approaches in research.
In practice, an integrated research program in which both approaches
are used in generating hypotheses, categories, measures, quantitative
data, and interpretations can profit from the strengths of both approa
ches while compensating for their weaknesses. Three studies of the Yup
no, Fiji, and Maya show how the interpretive approach contributes an u
nderstanding of the meaning of behavior in context whereas the quantit
ative approach contributes a precision of measurement that makes gener
alizations and comparisons possible. Integrating the two approaches ex
tends research findings in significant ways.