Interest in professional development based on competence-based educati
on and training (CBET) is growing. Competence models undoubtedly pose
some important, constructive challenges to traditional arrangements fo
r developing knowledge and expertise at all occupational levels. Howev
er, CBET's impact goes far beyond this. Its processes profoundly affec
t how teachers and learners view learning, assessment and the purposes
of education itself. CBET is also symptomatic of wider changes in not
ions about ownership, pluralism and breadth in post-compulsory educati
on and training. It therefore poses a profound and forceful ideologica
l challenge to particular educational values, and to the way teachers
approach their professional role. This article uses post-16 teacher ed
ucation as a focus for exploring some of these wider effects. It revie
ws recent critiques of CBET and argues that many are preoccupied with
attempting to improve its efficiency at the expense of examining the w
ider political and ideological context in which it is being implemente
d. In order to counter the drift towards a narrow utilitarian curricul
um in all sectors of the post-compulsory system, analyses of CBET will
need to show its powerful effect on some important democratic traditi
ons in learning and education. This would provide the basis for a more
coherent model of professional development than the limited and fragm
ented choices currently on offer.