There is a paucity of data on differences between methods for the asse
ssment of body composition in elderly subjects. Studies on younger adu
lts suggest that such differences are of some practical significance a
t the individual level. In the present study the following methods of
estimating percentage body fatness (BF%) were compared in healthy elde
rly men and women (mean age 70 (SD 6) years: densitometry; skinfold th
ickness; total body water; bioelectrical impedance (BIA) using an age-
specific predictive equation and the manufacturers' equation; body mas
s index (BMI). Though BF% estimates from the various methods tended to
be highly correlated with those from densitometry and with each other
, differences between methods at the individual level were marked. In
particular, the age-specific equations based on BMI and BIA systematic
ally overestimated BF% relative to the other methods. Biases between B
F% estimates derived from densitometry, skinfolds, BIA (manufacturers'
equation) and total body water were less marked, indicating little ev
idence of systematic differences between these methods in elderly subj
ects. Individual differences between methods were slightly greater tha
n those reported in some studies of younger adults, but this may be of
little practical significance, and may be considered inevitable in vi
ew of variability between and within subjects in the extent to which t
he underlying assumptions of these two-component methods are met in el
derly subjects.