This paper describes an analogy classification framework used with hig
h school chemistry textbooks. The framework takes into account aspects
of past research into analogies in science education to allow for a s
ystematic classification of textbook analogies based upon nine criteri
a including chemistry content area. Many of the 93 analogies classifie
d described abstract chemistry concepts such as atomic structure and b
onding, however, the frequent use of simple analogies, and the scarcit
y of stated limitations, are likely to create learning problems for st
udents. In some textbooks, authors made use of margin spaces to includ
e more analogies and these marginalised analogies often contained a pi
ctorial component. Recommendations for further research into analogies
in science education and possible methodological approaches are sugge
sted.