Me. Lunz et Ba. Bergstrom, AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY OF COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TEST ADMINISTRATION CONDITIONS, Journal of educational measurement, 31(3), 1994, pp. 251-263
This empirical study was designed to determine the impact of computeri
zed adaptive test (CAT) administration formats on student performance.
Students in medical technology programs took a paper-and-pencil and a
n individualized, computerized adaptive test. Students were randomly a
ssigned to adaptive test administration formats to ascertain the effec
t on student performance of altering: (a) the difficulty of the first
item, (b) the targeted level of test difficulty, (c) minimum test leng
th, and (d) the opportunity to control the test. Computerized adaptive
test data were analyzed with ANCOVA. The paper-and-pencil test was us
ed as a covariate to equalize ability variance among cells. The only s
ignificant main effect was for opportunity to control the test. There
were no significant interactions among test administration formats. Th
is study provides evidence concerning adjusting traditional computeriz
ed adaptive testing to more familiar testing modalities.