Much of the disagreement among educators of young children is about th
e extent to which programs should follow an approach emphasizing devel
opment from within (romantic school), development through interaction
(developmental/progressive school), or development from without (behav
ioral/cultural transmission school). Early-intervention programs for c
hildren with disabilities have tended to be aligned with the latter; d
aycare and nursery school programs for nonhandicapped, with the former
two. A natural question for educators is the extent to which these hi
storic schools of thought can be rationally joined. This article revie
ws the various positions on combining the schools-they are mutually in
compatible, they can be combined by instructional area, they can be co
mbined by a separation of means and ends, and they can be combined by
type of child. A schema is then suggested for a tripartite theoretical
amalgamation that takes into account the interlocking relationships a
mong objectives, methods, and child-nature. Such a proposal is particu
larly appropriate in early education where educational purposes tend t
o be broad and, increasingly, the nature of the children, diverse.