A. Tyler, THE ROLE OF SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE IN DISCOURSE STRUCTURE - SIGNALING LOGICAL AND PROMINENCE RELATIONS, Applied linguistics, 15(3), 1994, pp. 243-262
A qualitative investigation of varying syntactic patterns and their ef
fects on discourse structure was undertaken. The discourse under consi
deration was the lectures of two first-semester teaching assistants (T
As) in a botany lab, one a native speaker of American English whose di
scourse was perceived as relatively easy to follow the other of Korean
whose discourse was perceived as relatively difficult to follow. Each
TA gave a lecture accompanying a single set of slides. A qualitative
analysis of the two texts revealed a number of differences in discours
e structure, including different patterns of hypotaxis and parataxis.1
It is argued that the hypotactic constructions present in the NSs dis
course provide explicit signals of logical and prominence relations wh
ich are missing or used in an unexpected manner in the NNS's discourse
. The results offer support for a discourse framework which recognizes
that particular linguistic forms function as contextualization cues (
Gumperz 1982a, 1982b) which provide listeners with information concern
ing how to integrate information into the ongoing discourse.