Young children's knowledge of the practical use of objects was used to
investigate whether children's actions indicate their understanding o
f the functional use of objects independent of their ability to verbal
ly describe the appearance, reality, or function of the objects. Thirt
y-six children (12 two-year-olds, 12 three-year-olds, and 12 four-year
-olds) were presented with six objects pairs, each pair containing obj
ects similar in appearance but different in identity and function. Obj
ect pairs included illusory objects, toys, and pictures. Children were
asked to describe the appearance, the real identity, and the function
of each object, as well as show, using additional props, how the obje
cts could be used. Four-year-olds were better at reporting the identit
y and describing the function of the objects than the 2- and 3-year-ol
ds, but all the children performed similarly and significantly better
when asked to describe the appearance and display the function of the
objects. Analysis of error patterns on the appearance-reality question
s (considered together) regarding the deceptive items in the object pa
irs showed that with age children made fewer phenomenism errors. Howev
er, the majority of children of all three ages who made phenomenism er
rors were nevertheless able to show the function of the same objects.
The findings are discussed in relation to research on the development
of object knowledge and children's ability to distinguish appearance a
nd reality.