COMPARISON OF 3 WHOLE SEED NEAR-INFRARED ANALYZERS FOR MEASURING QUALITY COMPONENTS OF CANOLA SEED

Citation
Jk. Daun et al., COMPARISON OF 3 WHOLE SEED NEAR-INFRARED ANALYZERS FOR MEASURING QUALITY COMPONENTS OF CANOLA SEED, Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 71(10), 1994, pp. 1063-1068
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science & Tenology","Chemistry Applied
ISSN journal
0003021X
Volume
71
Issue
10
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1063 - 1068
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-021X(1994)71:10<1063:CO3WSN>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Whole seed near-infrared (NIR) analyzers are capable of high-speed com positional analysis of oilseed commodities. This study compared the Pe rCon Inframatic 8144 (Perten Instruments, North America Inc., Reno, NV ), the Tecator Infratec 1225 (Tecator AB, Hoganas, Sweden) and the NIR -systems 6500 (NIR Systems, Inc., Silver Spring, MD) analyzers for mea surement of oil, protein, chlorophyll and glucosinolates in intact can ola seed of composite samples from the Grain Research Laboratory's (Wi nnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) annual Western Canada Harvest Surveys (1985- 1989) for assembly of calibration and prediction sets. No significant differences were found between the three instruments for oil [standard error of prediction (SEP 0.43-0.55%)], protein (SEP 0.35-0.42%) and g lucosinolates (SEP 2.4-3.8 mM/g). Neither the Tecator nor the PerCon i nstruments were effective for determining chlorophyll. By combining oi l content and fatty acid composition data to give an estimate of the t otal level of each fatty acid in the sample, high correlations were ob tained for total saturates, linolenic acid, and linoleic acid although the RPD (ratio of the S.E. of prediction to the S.D. of the original data) values were not high enough to enable routine use of the method to predict results.