THE PREDICTION OF TOTAL-BODY WATER AND EXTRACELLULAR WATER FROM BIOELECTRIC IMPEDANCE IN OBESE CHILDREN

Citation
G. Bedogni et al., THE PREDICTION OF TOTAL-BODY WATER AND EXTRACELLULAR WATER FROM BIOELECTRIC IMPEDANCE IN OBESE CHILDREN, European journal of clinical nutrition, 51(3), 1997, pp. 129-133
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Nutrition & Dietetics
ISSN journal
09543007
Volume
51
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
129 - 133
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-3007(1997)51:3<129:TPOTWA>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the reliability of bioelectric impedance analysi s (BIA) for predicting total body water (TBW) and extracellular water (ECW) in obese children. Design: Comparison of five prediction models based on: (i) body weight (Wt), (ii) the impedance (Z) index (ZI=heigh t(2)/Z), (iii) the association of Wt and ZI, (iv) the body surface are a (SA) to impedance ratio (SA:Z) and, (v) the body volume (V) to imped ance ratio (V:Z). Subjects: Thirty obese and 25 control children of 11 .2+/-1.8 y of age. Measurements: TBW and ECW were assessed by deuteriu m and bromide dilution; Z was measured at frequencies of 5, 50 and 100 kHz. Results: In controls, Wt explained 11% more variance of TBW than ZI (r(2)=0.977, SEE=0.9 I, CV=3.8%) and the association of Wt and ZI improved the prediction of TBW only slightly (r(2)=0.982, SEE=0.8 I, C V=3.5%). The SA:Z and V:Z indexes explained 6 and 33% less variance of TBW respectively as compared to Wt alone. In obese subjects, ZI expla ined 4% more variance of TBW than Wt (r(2)=0.914, SEE=1.8 I, CV=6.4%) and the SA:Z ratio was the most accurate predictor of TBW (r(2)=0.959, SEE=1.2 l, CV=4.4%). However, the increase in the explained variance of TBW associated to the use of the SA:Z ratio was of only 1% as compa red to the association of ZI and Wt. The V:Z ratio explained 9% less o f variance of TBW as compared to ZI. In both control and obese subject s, the association of Wt and ZI offered the best prediction of ECW (r( 2)=0.807, SEE=1.564 I and r(2)=0.826, SEE=1.035 I, respectively). Howe ver, the values of CV were much higher in controls than in obese child ren (17.5% vs 8.4%) owing to their lower ECW and greater variability i n ECW%. ZI was the most accurate predictor of TBW on the pooled sample (n=55; r(2)=0.910, SEE=1.932 I, CV=7.4%). However, it was a poor pred ictor of ECW on the same sample owing to its high CV (n=55; r(2)=0.866 , SEE =1.806 I, CV=17.0%). Conclusions: The body surface area to imped ance ratio is the most accurate predictor of TBW in obese children but the association of ZI and Wt may be of more interest when BIA is used to estimate both TBW and ECW. The impedance index offers a good predi ction of TBW but not of ECW in children with different levels of fatne ss.