HOW CHILDREN REMEMBER WHAT THEY HAVE EATEN

Citation
Sb. Domel et al., HOW CHILDREN REMEMBER WHAT THEY HAVE EATEN, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 94(11), 1994, pp. 1267-1272
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Nutrition & Dietetics
ISSN journal
00028223
Volume
94
Issue
11
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1267 - 1272
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8223(1994)94:11<1267:HCRWTH>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objectives To determine whether students could verbalize, within 11/2 hours, how they remembered items eaten at the school lunch; to determi ne whether the categories of self-reported retrieval mechanisms were s imilar for two interview styles, integrated and nonintegrated; and to determine the effect of the two interview styles on the accuracy of re porting items eaten by comparing reports with direct observation. Desi gn Two styles of dietary intake interviews were compared with observed intake in a school lunch setting. Setting Two elementary schools in G eorgia. Subjects/samples Eighty-two of 106 fourth graders from four cl asses volunteered; 24 (six per class) were randomly selected and assig ned to an interview style. Students interviewed using a nonintegrated style verbalized how they remembered after they had reported everythin g eaten. Students interviewed using an integrated style verbalized how they remembered at the same time they reported eating each item. Both interview styles included free report followed by prompted report. Ma in outcome measures Reported retrieval mechanisms were coded into 13 c ategories. Five measures of performance (specific match rate, general match rate, intrusion rate, omission rate, and overall match rate) wer e calculated by interview style for free report and prompted report se parately. Statistical analyses performed We analyzed the effect of int erview style on the number of students reaching 100% accuracy after pr ompting and on accuracy of reporting condiments using Fisher's exact t est. Results Most students could articulate how they remembered items eaten. Reported retrieval mechanism categories were comparable for bot h interview styles. Visual imagery, usual practice, behavior chaining, and preference were the most commonly reported retrieval mechanisms. Accuracy of free reports did not differ by interview style; however, t he nonintegrated interview style produced dietary self-reports with fe wer condiment omissions during free report and higher accuracy after p rompting. Applications Determining what retrieval mechanisms children commonly use for remembering items eaten may help researchers design c ues to improve the accuracy of dietary self-reports. More accurate die tary self-reports could markedly affect the many types of research tha t use dietary assessment.