THE EFFECTS OF PARTISAN 3RD PARTIES ON NEGOTIATOR BEHAVIOR AND OUTCOME PERCEPTIONS

Authors
Citation
De. Conlon et Wh. Ross, THE EFFECTS OF PARTISAN 3RD PARTIES ON NEGOTIATOR BEHAVIOR AND OUTCOME PERCEPTIONS, Journal of applied psychology, 78(2), 1993, pp. 280-290
Citations number
40
ISSN journal
00219010
Volume
78
Issue
2
Year of publication
1993
Pages
280 - 290
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9010(1993)78:2<280:TEOP3P>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Two sources of third-party partisanship are: (1) the preexisting affil iation a third party may have with the negotiators and (2) the overt s upport a third party demonstrates by imposing an outcome. In 2 experim ents, subjects involved in a negotiation simulation were told prior to negotiation that the third party was either positively affiliated wit h their side or with their opponent's side. In both studies, third par ties imposed settlements on the disputants, reflecting varying degrees of overt support. The results suggest that negative third-party affil iation reduced disputant outcome expectations (thereby improving the l ikelihood of an agreement) and led to enhanced ratings of outcome and third-party satisfaction relative to favorable third-party affiliation . The results are consistent with predictions made by both prospect an d control theory