FLUID INTAKE IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZED ELDERLY

Citation
Jc. Chidester et Aa. Spangler, FLUID INTAKE IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZED ELDERLY, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 97(1), 1997, pp. 23-28
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Nutrition & Dietetics
ISSN journal
00028223
Volume
97
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
23 - 28
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8223(1997)97:1<23:FIITIE>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Objective Actual fluid intake in the institutionalized elderly nas com pared with three established standards to determine adequacy of fluid intake. Design Consecutive 3-day food and fluid intake was observed di rectly and analyzed by computer for water content. Number and frequenc y of medications and Minimum Data Set (MDS) information about cognitiv e skills, physical locomotion, and ability to understand were obtained from medical records. Recommended fluid intake was determined using t hree established standards for two age groups: 65 through 85 years and 86 through 100 years. The standards were 30 mL/kg body weight (standa rd 1); 1 ml/kcal energy consumed (standard 2); and 100 mL/kg for first 10 kg, 50 mL/kg for next 10 kg, and 15 mL for remaining kg (standard 3). Subjects/setting Data were collected in one nursing home. Subjects were 40 residents who were free from acute illness and infection and/ or were not receiving enteral feedings. Main outcome measures Fluid in take and MDS data were collected. Data about medications were obtained after preliminary data collection observations. Statistical analysis performed A two-tailed t test was used to compare actual fluid intake with recommended fluid intake. Interaction effect of age on fluid inta ke was analyzed using multiple analysis of variance. Correlations were used to evaluate relationships among fluid intake, number and frequen cy of medications, age, weight, and MDS data. Results This population received adequate or more than adequate fluid according to the standar ds of 30 mL/kg body weight or 1 mL/kcal energy consumed, but inadequat e fluid according to standard 3, which adjusted for extremes of underw eight or overweight. Age was not a factor in adequacy of fluid intake. Positive correlations existed between fluid obtained from nonmeal fee dings and number and frequency of medications. Applications When the s tandard of 30 mL/kg body weight is used, underweight residents have un realistically low fluid recommendations. Standard 3: which adjusts for extremes in body weight, is more reasonable for patients whether they are of normal weight, underweight, or overweight. This standard more closely supports other recommendations of 1,500 to 2,000 mt fluid inta ke per day. Number and frequency of medications influences the amount of fluid residents obtain during nonmeal feedings.