The key issue of ethical applications of fear appeals, which has been
generally avoided in marketing literature, is reviewed The authors dev
elop an evaluation framework, the ethical effects-reasoning matrix (ER
M), using multiple interest groups (stakeholders) and multiple ethical
reasoning perspectives. The framework is intended to aid in isolating
and identifying conflicts that may arise when fear appeals are consid
ered from a variety of ethical perspectives involving many interested
publics. An example is provided to indicate application of the framewo
rk as well as conflict resolution techniques.