We examine the incentives for abuse under rate-of-return (ROR) and inc
remental surplus subsidy (ISS) regulation. Abuse consists of expenditu
res by the regulated firm that provide private benefits, but do not re
duce production costs. We show that ISS regulation provides efficient
incentives for owners of the regulated firm to limit abuse by subordin
ates. We also prove that abuse by owners of the firm will generally be
greater (smaller) under ROR regulation than under ISS regulation when
consumer demand for the regulated product is inelastic (elastic). Fur
thermore, we show that to limit abuse and improve welfare under ROR re
gulation, it can bo advantageous to ''ignore'' available information a
bout consumer demand.