Ways of knowing statistical concepts are reviewed. A general three-cat
egory structure for knowing is proposed: (a) calculations, (b) proposi
tions, and (c) conceptual understandings. Test items were developed th
at correspond to the first category and to a partitioning of the two l
atter categories into words and symbols. Thirty-one items covering the
five types were administered to 57 graduate students. Correlation of
student scores on the 10-item calculations subtest and the 10-item pro
positions subtest was .61, whereas the other two intercategory correla
tions were .40 (Calculations vs. Conceptual Understandings) and .37 (P
ropositions vs. Conceptual Understandings). The results suggest that s
tudents should be tested in more than one domain, and that instructors
should expect students to develop conceptual understanding in additio
n to skills in computation.