Four problematic areas associated with the identification of foodborne
yeasts are discussed. These consist of (1) the inability of conventio
nal identification tests to recognize some common and important foodbo
rne yeasts characterized by genomic differences (e.g., Saccharomyces c
erevisiae, S. bayanus and S. pastorianus); (2) the delay in applicatio
n of non-traditional identification methods such as DNA fingerprinting
, chromosome karyotyping, protein electrophoretic patterns and fatty a
cid profiles for routine identification purposes; (3) the lack of comm
ercially available manual or automated identification systems dedicate
d to the diagnosis of foodborne yeasts; and (4) the disregard for cons
idering ecological frequency of yeasts in computerized probabilistic i
dentification systems.