B. Duan et Wp. Dunlap, THE ACCURACY OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR ESTIMATING THE STANDARD ERROR OF CORRELATIONS CORRECTED FOR RANGE RESTRICTION, Educational and psychological measurement, 57(2), 1997, pp. 254-265
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational","Psychologym Experimental","Mathematical, Methods, Social Sciences","Mathematics, Miscellaneous
A Monte Carlo study was conducted to compare the accuracy of different
estimates of the standard error of correlations corrected for restric
tion in range. It was found that the procedure suggested by P. Bobko a
nd A. Rieck, also derived by N. S. Raju and colleagues, generated the
most accurate estimates of the standard error compared to other existi
ng procedures. The study also repeated previous findings that Pearson
correlations corrected for restriction in range resulted in more accur
ate estimates of the population rho than did the restricted correlatio
ns, but the accuracy of the approximation of population rho decreased
as the selection criterion became higher. Another finding of the study
was that the standard error of correlations under range restriction t
ended to increase as the selection ratios decreased.