Research has consistently found nominal group brainstorming (in which
members work separately without communicating) to be superior to brain
storming in which group members interact verbally. This article presen
ts the results of an experiment that found the reverse to be true for
computer-mediated electronic brainstorming. In this experiment, 12-mem
ber electronically interacting groups generated more ideas than did 12
-member nominal groups, and there were no differences between 6-member
electronic and 6-member nominal groups. The authors attribute these r
esults to the ability of electronic brainstorming to introduce few pro
cess losses (production blocking, evaluation apprehension, and free ri
ding) while enabling process gains (synergy and the avoidance of redun
dant ideas).