CORRELATES OF SOME CURIOUS REGRESSIONS ON A MEASURE OF INTELLIGENCE

Citation
Lg. Humphreys et al., CORRELATES OF SOME CURIOUS REGRESSIONS ON A MEASURE OF INTELLIGENCE, Journal of school psychology, 31(3), 1993, pp. 385-405
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational
ISSN journal
00224405
Volume
31
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
385 - 405
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4405(1993)31:3<385:COSCRO>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
In the course of a methodological investigation of regressions of mean s of selected tests, computed in stratified levels of a general intell igence composite, on the mean levels of intelligence within the strata we encountered curious phenomena at the low end of the distribution o f intelligence. At about -2.00 SD units of that distribution, the regr essions of the vocabulary means for both boys and girls turned abruptl y upwards, while those for mechanical reasoning dropped sharply. To in vestigate these curious regressions, we formed high and low vocabulary groups for each sex within the low-scoring subsample of general intel ligence, and the means of the four groups on a series of cognitive and self-report scales were obtained. In this sample the high school boys and girls who are high in vocabulary relative to their low scores on the intelligence composite have lower means than their low-low control s on a set of cognitive tests epitomized by visualization in three dim ensions, but the set also includes verbal tests in which the tasks are ambiguous and require inference and hypothesis formation in order to obtain a solution. Correct answers are not directly present in long-te rm memory as they are for the academic (including mathematics) and non academic information tests, on which the two high vocabulary groups ar e substantially superior. The high and the low vocabulary groups also differ from each other in health histories, personality traits, vocati onal interests, and biographical data scores, the high groups being co nsistently closer to the norm for their high school class. Sex differe nces are minimal in the incidence of the deficit and in its correlates . A genetic explanation for the problem is plausible, but the locus is not on the 23rd pair of chromosomes.