In response to Waltman and Burleson's indictment that the Kearney et a
l. Behavior Alteration Technique checklist suffers from an item desira
bility bias, we submit two major arguments which undermine altogether
their claim. We illustrate that their entire allegation rests on first
, a faulty premise (i.e., a distortion of the literature documenting w
hat teachers actually do in the classroom) and second, on an indefensi
ble research design which fails to test their contention.