ITEM DESIRABILITY BIAS AND THE BAT CHECKLIST - REPLY

Authors
Citation
P. Kearney et Tg. Plax, ITEM DESIRABILITY BIAS AND THE BAT CHECKLIST - REPLY, Communication education, 46(2), 1997, pp. 95-99
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Communication,"Education & Educational Research
Journal title
ISSN journal
03634523
Volume
46
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
95 - 99
Database
ISI
SICI code
0363-4523(1997)46:2<95:IDBATB>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
In response to Waltman and Burleson's indictment that the Kearney et a l. Behavior Alteration Technique checklist suffers from an item desira bility bias, we submit two major arguments which undermine altogether their claim. We illustrate that their entire allegation rests on first , a faulty premise (i.e., a distortion of the literature documenting w hat teachers actually do in the classroom) and second, on an indefensi ble research design which fails to test their contention.