A series of four experiments was designed to study the cognitive load
consequences of learning from equations, as compared to words. Cogniti
ve load theory suggests that some instructional procedures require lea
rners to engage in cognitive activities solely because of the manner i
n which information is presented rather than because of intrinsic char
acteristics of the material. As a consequence, a heavy extraneous cogn
itive load that interferes with learning may be imposed. It is suggest
ed that in studying equations with unfamiliar notations, a heavy extra
neous cognitive load is generated because mental integration of notati
ons and meanings is required. The results of Experiment 1 supported th
is suggestion. Experiment 2 found that when an equation format involve
s simple equations and familiar notations, it is more effective than a
n equivalent verbal format which requires substantial reading. Experim
ent 3 showed that when the use of notations becomes automated after ex
tended practice and thus reduces the extraneous cognitive load require
d to mentally integrate notations and meanings, an equation format can
be more effective than a verbal format. Experiment 4 indicated that s
upplementing a concise equation format with extensive verbal informati
on does not assist learning, because processing the extensive verbal i
nformation induces a heavy cognitive load which creates redundancy eff
ects. It was concluded that the efficacy of equations or words may dep
end, in part, on their cognitive load consequences.