Most research in memory strategy development involves cross-sectional
studies, with the implicit assumption that the patterns found in these
studies are an accurate reflection of intraindividual changes over ti
me. In this article, we review briefly the development of rehearsal an
d organizational strategies based on cross-sectional research and then
review the findings from the few longitudinal studies assessing intra
individual change in these strategies, focusing on results from the Mu
nich Longitudinal Study (LOGIC). Although average, age-related pattern
s obtained from longitudinal samples provide similar development funct
ions as those obtained from cross-sectional samples, there is much gre
ater individual variability in strategy acquisition observed in the lo
ngitudinal data. This suggests that the canonical development patterns
inferred from cross-sectional studies often obfuscate actual intraind
ividual patterns. Longitudinal evidence also indicates that utilizatio
n deficiencies are observed less frequently than assumed in cross-sect
ional research. (C) 1997 Academic Press.