This article examines a core problematic of bureaucracy. It suggests t
hat the study of bureaucracy should make a clearer nonbureaucratic tur
n, focusing appropriately on what is described as the in-between Analy
sis of structural limits of the in-between-hierarchy and lateralizatio
n-should center on the nonbureaucratic. Structure is not the central i
ssue. Rather; structure is a surrogate for competing manifest and late
nt nonbureaucratic perspectives. Hierarchy is a surrogate not only for
a rational order of justice but also for the feasibility of epistemol
ogical certainty. Lateralization is a surrogate not only for human aut
onomy but also for skepticism and hesitation in knowing. The study of
bureaucracy cannot be limited satisfactorily to ''bureaucratic man.''
Rather humans are irreducibly bio-psycho-spirituo-social-cultural bein
gs.