B. Volkel et al., INFLUENCE OF SECONDARY ELECTRONS IN PROXIMAL PROBE LITHOGRAPHY, Journal of vacuum science & technology. B, Microelectronics and nanometer structures processing, measurement and phenomena, 15(6), 1997, pp. 2877-2881
This article describes the limitations of proximal probe lithography d
ue to electrons that are mirrored by the electric field between the ti
p and the surface. The incident beam generates two kinds of electrons
at the sample surface: primary electrons which are elastically backsca
ttered and secondary electrons which are produced in the resist/substr
ate system. The electric field confines the electrons emanating from t
he surface. The electron trajectories are bent in such a way that the
electrons impinge on the sample surface in the vicinity of their origi
n. These reflected electrons contribute to the exposure of the resist
and therefore, limit the resolution. For hexadecanethiol monolayers on
gold substrates, we have measured the energy distribution of the mirr
ored electrons and the secondary electron yield as a function of the p
rimary energy. With near edge x-ray absorption fine structure spectros
copy, we have investigated the relevance of low energy electrons in th
e exposure of hexadecanethiol films. Simulations of secondary electron
trajectories can explain the occurrence of triple line structures obs
erved in field emission proximal probe lithography. (C) 1997 American
Vacuum Society.