Many studies have found that unionized workers express less job satisf
action than nonunion workers. The ''exit-voice'' explanation of this p
henomenon is that dissatisfied nonunion workers tend to quit, whereas
dissatisfied union workers tend to remain in their jobs and express th
eir complaints through various voice mechanisms provided by their unio
n. Furthermore, this ''voiced'' dissatisfaction, animated by the hope
of effecting change, is said to be distinct from ''genuine'' dissatisf
action. This study, the first to examine the exit-voice issue in Brita
in, expands on the set of independent variables used by similar North
American and Australian studies. When they control for industrial rela
tions climate, the authors find that the negative relationship between
unionization and satisfaction dwindles to insignificance in many case
s. They conclude that union workers' relative dissatisfaction is in mo
st cases entirely ''genuine'' and stems from poor industrial relations
or from unions forming where satisfaction would be low anyway.