S. Bell, NOT IN ISOLATION - THE NECESSITY OF SYSTEMIC HEURISTIC DEVICES IN ALLDEVELOPMENT PRACTICE, Public administration and development, 17(5), 1997, pp. 449-452
This brief essay is a response to the article by Cooke (Cooke, 1997) i
n which he sets out the case for a clinical model of development pract
ice. Developing the theme that any methodology taken in isolation will
become self-fulfilling in its activity and taking up Cooke's 'challen
ges for Development Studies' whilst building off the criticism set out
by Blunt (Blunt, 1997) and upon an earlier work, I set out the impera
tive for inclusive and systemic tools to aid our understanding of deve
lopment contexts. Paradigms of scientific thought (the prisons of Blun
t) and tyrannies of methodology are unwholesome and ultimately self-de
structive devices. It is argued that only by adopting a holistic syste
ms approach, including the wealth of potential tools for problems solv
ing and developing our creative thinking in partnership, can developme
nt studies achieve real understanding of what must otherwise always be
seen as remaining an unknowable and mysterious context. (C) 1997 John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd.