Jm. Fuente et al., EFFECT OF STORAGE TIME AND DIETARY ENZYME ON THE METABOLIZABLE ENERGYAND DIGESTA VISCOSITY OF BARLEY-BASED DIETS FOR POULTRY, Poultry science, 77(1), 1998, pp. 90-97
The effect of barley storage time and dietary enzyme addition on the e
nergy value of barley-based broiler diets was studied in two experimen
ts. A two-rowed winter barley (Beka cultivar) was stored at room tempe
rature for 0, 3, 6, 16, and 32 wk after harvesting. At these dates, di
ets were formulated using 50% barley with and without the addition of
a commercial beta-glucanase-based enzyme product. In Experiment 1,320
Arbor Acres chickens (eight replicates of three 10-d-old birds and eig
ht replicates of one 30-d-old bird, per treatment) were fed the experi
mental diets to determine the AME(n) following a 2 x 2 x 5 (age by enz
yme by barley storage time) factorial design. At the end of the metabo
lism trial, viscosity of the intestinal contents was determined in 30-
d-old broilers. Total beta-glucan, nonstarch polysaccharides (NSP), in
vitro viscosity, and endogenous enzyme activity of barley grain decre
ased with increasing storage time. Dietary AME, increased. with barley
storage time (from 2,755 to 2,939 kcal/kg DM, P < 0.001, for 0 and 32
wk of storage, respectively), with enzyme addition (2,861 vs 2,919 kc
al/kg DM, P < 0.003), and with the age of animals (2,826 and 2,958 kca
l/kg DM for 10-and 30-d-old chickens, respectively, P < 0.001). Intera
ctions of enzyme and age by barley storage time (P < 0.02 and P < 0.00
1, respectively) were also detected. These data indicate that the mini
mum time of: barley storage before its inclusion in broiler feed depen
ds on the animals' age (more than 6 wk for 10-d-old chickens and 3 wk
for 30-d-old chickens), and that the use of enzymes allowed a reductio
n in the time of barley storage. Digesta viscosity decreased with barl
ey storage time (P < 0.001), and with enzyme addition (P < 0.001), an
interaction of storage time by enzyme addition was shown (P < 0.007).
Digesta viscosity was also negatively related to the dietary AME(n) co
ntent (r = -0.68, P < 0.01). In vitro barley viscosity explained 53 an
d 90% of the variation in gut viscosity produced by unsupplemented and
enzyme supplemented diets, respectively. In Experiment 2, the same di
ets as Experiment 1 and the barley grain were intubated into 120 adult
roosters (Hy-Line(R)) to determine TMEn. Dietary and barley TMEn valu
es were not affected by barley storage time or enzyme addition (3,237
and 3,037 kcal TMEn/kg DM for diets and barley, respectively).