An important stimulus for cereal sector reform has been the massive fi
scal costs of many state procurement and intervention agencies, This h
as led to policies to minimize their role in the future through rapid
market liberalization and a substantially increased role for the priva
te sector, This approach may pay insufficient attention to price stabi
lization and food security issues, There are several instances in whic
h, even with a well-developed private sector, government intervention
will be required to achieve adequate stability, Moreover, where the pr
ivate sector is not fully developed, public sector agencies can potent
ially play an important, but hopefully declining, role in either perfo
rming or financing stabilization services, International assistance co
uld be invaluable in supporting well-run intervention agencies through
temporary liquidity crises, Cereal sector reform is a difficult proce
ss even with strong government commitment, This is frequently weakened
because donor agencies are unwilling to appreciate and accommodate th
e real fears of governments concerning their loss of control over food
security as a consequence of rapid liberalization, The hope is expres
sed that with a more measured pace and explicit concern for this issue
a stronger commitment to reform might emerge. (C) 1998 Elsevier Scien
ce Ltd. All rights reserved.