Courses on quantitative research methods play a central role in many u
ndergraduate programs in sociology. However, students' anxiety over th
e courses is a major concern for instructors. Many students perceive t
he subject as inherently uninteresting and difficult. This paper descr
ibes an experiment designed to introduce aspects of quantitative reaso
ning into a large substantively focused class in the social sciences.
The experiment assessed whether students can learn quantitative reason
ing skills in the context of a large ''nonmethods'' class in sociology
. The experiment measured students' mastery of these skills by compari
ng their competence at quantitative reasoning at the beginning and end
of the class term. The results revealed that students' abilities to i
nterpret and manipulate empirical data increased significantly. Furthe
r, the increase occurred independent of students' basic reasoning skil
ls as measured by baseline SAT verbal and math scores. This paper disc
usses the implications of these findings for teaching quantitative met
hods in sociology undergraduate curricula.