Gj. Langewouters et al., WHY USE FINAPRES OR PORTAPRES RATHER THAN INTRAARTERIAL OR INTERMITTENT NONINVASIVE TECHNIQUES OF BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT, Journal of medical engineering & technology, 22(1), 1998, pp. 37-43
In the clinic, blood pressure is measured almost exclusively using non
-invasive intermittent techniques, of which the auscultatory (Riva-Roc
ci/Korotkoff; RRK) and the computerized oscillometric method are most
often used. However, both methods only provide a momentary value. In a
ddition, the accuracy is hampered by phenomena such as cuff response a
nd white coat hypertension, thus providing artefactually increased val
ues. The vascular unloading technique of Penaz together with the Physi
ocal criteria of Wesseling provide reliable, noninvasive and continuou
s estimates of blood pressure. This technique is thus an alternative t
o the invasive intra-arterial measurements in many cases, without the
risks and ethical questions inherent to invasive measurements. Since t
he pressure waveform is available continuously, computations such as p
ulse contour and Modelflow cardiac output, spectral analysis and baror
eflex sensitivity provide further information on the dynamics of the c
ardiovascular system on a beat-to-beat basis, similar to intra-arteria
l measurements.