This article investigates attitudes that underlie international strate
gy processes. We propose survey scales of these attitudes and describe
tests thai support their reliability and validity as measures. of con
structs-including integration, responsiveness, and coordination-that r
esearchers have used for many years in case analyses of international
strategy and organization. We also propose and validate scales to capt
ure the perceived alignment with firms' international objectives of ke
y business policies that affect individuals, including accountability
for global results, career opportunity and a globally shared meaning s
ystem that informs communication and discussion about change. Our disc
ussion of these tests offers an assessment of how changing patterns of
association among the measures over rime conform to expectations gene
rated by the case-based empirical literature. We argue that these patt
erns document a process of organizational learning that can link manag
ers' mind-sets with senior managers' intentions in the course of proac
tive international strategic change. The analysis relies on survey res
ponses taken in 1992 and 1995 from 370 managers in 13 country affiliat
es and the head office of a U.S.-based diversified multinational corpo
ration (DMNC). (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.