G. P. Latham and G. Whyte (1994) found that managers gave less positiv
e evaluations to a proposal to implement a valid selection procedure w
hen information about the utility of that procedure was also given. Th
e authors hypothesized that the manner in which the utility informatio
n was presented might explain this result. Two empirical studies (Ns =
145 and 186) were conducted. Results of mean contrast analyses show t
hat the effect found by Latham and Whyte was not replicated, that revi
sed scenarios including utility information are more understandable to
managers, and that utility information presented in a revised manner
has a low-to-moderate positive effect on the acceptability ratings tha
t managers give to these selection proposals. However, acceptability r
atings remain disappointingly low no matter which scenario is presente
d. Future study is encouraged to examine managerial reactions to innov
ations suggested by psychological research.