This paper re-examines some aspects of the 'real books-reading scheme
books' debate which erupted into the British literacy education field
re decade ago. It argues that the debate was nor only over-polarised b
ut that it did not take appropriate account of a scholarly review of r
elated research by Professor Jeanne Chall which had been published a f
ew years earlier. Subsequent research has further supported Chall's ar
guments. The paper indicates how the use of reading scheme and real bo
oks can be reconciled in curriculum programmes which are sensitive to
how learning needs change in the course of early literacy development.
It also notes the related significance of some current developments i
n the field, such as the National Literacy Project and the Literacy Ta
sk Force.