5 YEARS AFTER IMPLEMENTATION - THE ROLE OF THE DISTRICT IN MAINTAINING AN ONGOING SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS

Citation
Gg. Lofton et al., 5 YEARS AFTER IMPLEMENTATION - THE ROLE OF THE DISTRICT IN MAINTAINING AN ONGOING SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS, School effectiveness and school improvement, 9(1), 1998, pp. 58-69
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Education & Educational Research
ISSN journal
09243453
Volume
9
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
58 - 69
Database
ISI
SICI code
0924-3453(1998)9:1<58:5YAI-T>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The longitudinal study reported here provides insight into the rule of the school district in implementing and maintaining the essential ele ments of a nine-year statewide improvement project called SPUR five ye ars after the termination of stare funding and external support. Rev t o the conceptualization of SPUR were findings From the comprehensive R and Study (McLaughlin & Marsh, 1978) on successful change efforts emph asizing the importance of implementing an ongoing improvement process. On-site visits to six districts and a follow-up survey of all 60 part icipating school districts were used to determine maintenance of the p rocess. factors facilitating/impeding maintenance, and long-term benef its. Results suggest that SPUR represents a viable improvement process that can be implemented and maintained in districts and schools with positive outcomes. individual and organizational efficacy as well as a n increased capacity fur change and innovation were found to be direct ly related to the level of district maintenance and support.